Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Salutations to Stone Sharpeners!
#51
but what is ground off your blade is not always microscopic.  I use a magnetic trap on my grinder and regularly clean off clumps of steel dust.  this is not a tempest in a teapot sitation, industry has been studying the problem since the 1920's.  it does not mean that if you apply too much pressure for a second and get some sparks that the entire edge is ruined.  
not bashing a company, bashing the process.  I guess it comes down to this, peer reviewed testing shows you can mess up your knife with improper use of power sharpening equipment.  you can choose to modify you methods of sharpening or possibly mess up your knife.
Reply
#52
I think it depends on how tiny the edge defects are.  The very high flash temperatures are very short lived, from 0.001 to 0.000001 seconds based on Mr. Jan's linked paper.  Higher temperature needs less time, but that is a very short time frame.
Reply
#53
Holy smokes what's gotten into the drinking water here? Don't bash any company's products here! You can bash the process but not the company that utilizes the process.
Reply
#54
(01-04-2018, 05:52 PM)EOU Wrote: Holy smokes what's gotten into the drinking water here? Don't bash any company's products here! You can bash the process but not the company that utilizes the process.

sorry, i should have down loaded the video and just shown a 5 or 10 second clip of their sharpening process.
Reply
#55
I like Mr. Livesey's mention of a magnetic trap under the grinder.  I think I"l add that to my Kally.  Currently I have a 4" dust collector hose just below the work rest.  It does good job for the light sharpening I do.  I hear that breathing steel  and abrasive dust is probably not the best of ideas.  That's one thing that Tormek has going for it.  Zero dust.  Some messy water/sludge spatter, but zero dust.

So, when you are making a knife that requires a lot of heavy grinding to make the shape of the blade, you know, maybe a smooth taper from spine to edge or a large concave down to the edge, what's the process there?  Seems like overheating would almost unavoidable when doing that much grinding.

Is the deal that the basic blade shape is created and then the blade is hardened just before the final sharpening?

What if when grinding you screw up and heat a blade enough to turn it blue.  Could you the redo the complete HT/temper process and everything would be OK?
Reply
#56
There's a hundred different ways to do it. Some people grind after heat treatment, some grind before heat treating. Some grind wet, some use milling machines. It's possible to grind after heat treating without damaging the heat treatment. You just have to be very careful.
Reply
#57
the magnets on my grinder are dual purpose, they collect steel dust on their own and also hold the end of my 2" dust collector hose. ideally, you grind as much as you can before heat treat. I usually progress 60, then 100 or 120 then 220. after heat treat, I use 80 then 100 dry and finish basic grind. for final grind and baseline sharpening, 100 or 120 , then 220 then 400, all wet. if you heat to blue, you have a soft blade, no turning back
Reply
#58
(01-04-2018, 07:57 PM)scott.livesey Wrote:
(01-04-2018, 05:52 PM)EOU Wrote: Holy smokes what's gotten into the drinking water here? Don't bash any company's products here! You can bash the process but not the company that utilizes the process.

sorry, i should have down loaded the video and just shown a 5 or 10 second clip of their sharpening process.

Not to worry and thank you for your understanding. We've been known to step in it every once in a while. When we do, we hope that you return the favor and draw our attention to it.
Reply
#59
I can grind a lot of steel using a Tormek (wet) with a 46 grit Norton 3X wheel or an 80 grit CBN wheel. The steel stays cool. (I use Honerite Gold at the recommended 1:25 dilution with water to prevent wheel and bushing rust.)

I can certainly understand being reluctant to grind or sharpen with high speed (hot) grinding equipment. I would not include the Tormek in that category. I would also not be quite as dogmatic about a belt grinder with a variable speed DC motor and a smaller drive pulley designed to decrease the surface feet per minute and increase the torque.

Ken
Reply
#60
Okay, we're going to break the thread rules here but only temporarily. Seems like this might be a good place to introduce the idea since there has been a lot of discussion germane to edge retention in this and other threads. This is going to be an attempt at quantifying and testing some of the theories discussed. We're going to simultaneously open a new thread in the EDGE TESTING  forum for further discussion so as not to distract more than we've already done from this thread so please respond to this post in the EDGE TESTING FORUM as opposed to this thread.

We're running this up the flagpole here because we're interested in your input so please, input away.

The premise here is that edge rolling is a major contributor to dull edges and edge longevity (retention).  Edge overheating during the sharpening process is probably one of these contributing factors that we could all agree on but how much of a problem is it? A little, a lot or a whole lot? If one sharpening methodology seems to indicate a very measurable effect on edge rolling does another methodology effectively mitigate it? Of course there are many other contributing factors that could be tested for as well and we won't try to enumerate them all here but, of course, initial sharpness level, steel hardness and blade geometry come to mind readily.

One thing that we have absolute confidence in here is the ability of our instrumentation to measure the effect of edge rolling. We can't tell you, in inches or degrees, how much the edge has rolled but we can measure its effect on edge sharpness with great certainty. But that what's it's all about for all of us here isn't it? How easy or difficult it is to cut through something.

So we propose to build a test apparatus. A test apparatus that will perform one very simple test; how much did an edge roll expressed by it's decrease in sharpness? We propose to measure the sharpness level of a particular location of a prepared edge then lower,very carefully, that edge onto a narrow strip of hardened steel and then measure again to obtain an indication of how much the edge edge rolled as a result of the process. We will be able to add loading (weight) to the process should that prove useful. 

So there you have it! It's a simple test stand to build and if you guys think that it could deliver useful information then we'll build it. We'll test the edges we create and we'll test the edges you create if that's how you want it. If you have thoughts, design or otherwise, we'd like to hear them.  Please keep in mind that we are testing for only (1) one factor with this test instrument, edge rolling. We do not intend to try to define, with this device, how much better (or worse) a toothy edge slices than a polished edge  or any one of a myriad of other questions we'd like to answer. 

 So we're moving this over to the Edge Testing Forum now so hope that we hear from you there.

   
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)