04-12-2018, 11:25 AM
There is a logical very low cost option. The problem with the paper cutting option is the variety of papers used. In itself, it is not a bad method. Spending around $5 US for a box of quality 20lb copy paper goes a long way toward making the tests consistent. With care and practice, one can soon develop a feel and an ear for good cutting.
Admittedly, this method has its limitations. It provides no repeatable numeric of sharpness like BESS. However, for the more casual sharpener or those on a tight budget, a well regulated paper testing routine has possibilities.
I have been corresponding with another bessex member who just purchased a PT-50A, the top of the line. He chose wisely. He is a machinist, accostumed to working within very tight tolerances. Regardless of his actual sharpness needs, he would not feel comfortable working with a tester which did not have the highest accuracy.
I was quite content with my KN-100, and am very happy with my original PT-50. However, in hindsight, if it had been available at the time, I should have purchased a PT-50A. I had no idea then how involved with sharpening I would become.
Ken
Admittedly, this method has its limitations. It provides no repeatable numeric of sharpness like BESS. However, for the more casual sharpener or those on a tight budget, a well regulated paper testing routine has possibilities.
I have been corresponding with another bessex member who just purchased a PT-50A, the top of the line. He chose wisely. He is a machinist, accostumed to working within very tight tolerances. Regardless of his actual sharpness needs, he would not feel comfortable working with a tester which did not have the highest accuracy.
I was quite content with my KN-100, and am very happy with my original PT-50. However, in hindsight, if it had been available at the time, I should have purchased a PT-50A. I had no idea then how involved with sharpening I would become.
Ken